
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/">
	<channel>
		<title>TechEd Bloggers Management</title>
		<link>http://www.msteched.com/online/blogs.aspx</link>
		<description></description>
		<managingEditor>info@indepth-tech.com</managingEditor>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:00:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Ashton RssHandler</generator>
		<!--
		
		-->
		
					<item>
						
						<title>You Only Need 2 Computers to Qualify for Volume Licensing</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28640.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Eric Ligman</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28640.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4195' ent:classification='BLOG'>Eric Ligman</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28640.item'&gt;Eric Ligman&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"Here is a misunderstanding I come across from time to time...So contrary to the belief of some, no, you do not need to have five (5) computers to qualify for the Open License or Open Value Volume Licensing programs at Microsoft and companies with as few as two (2) computers can easily qualify for both.  Keep this in mind the next time you are speaking to..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28640.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:28:43 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>SCCM 2007 Tips</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28559.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:56:18 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Steve Schofield</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28559.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='1125' ent:classification='BLOG'>Steve Schofield</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28559.item'&gt;Steve Schofield&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...I'm evaluating SCCM 2007 / R2.    Here is some tips / tricks so far. 1) Make sure SQL Server 2008 w/sp1 runs as a domain account vs. local system 2) Run setspn and grant the sql server account so the SCCM 2007 check can resolve it 3) Grant the SCCM site server 'local admin' permissions on the sql server 4)..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28559.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:56:18 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Examples of Vastly Improved Management of SCOM R2 Agents </title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28558.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:53:12 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28558.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28558.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...Until now you had to create such a View yourself. Now this View is present at default so with a few mouse clicks and a single glance one can see at what Version the SCOM Agents are and whether or not a certain hotfix/CU has been applied...Select one of the performance views and then an Agent in the underneath pane. Soon a graph will be displayed showing..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28558.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:53:12 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>System Center Core Monitoring Reports are Fast and Easy With Good Information</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28524.item</link>
						<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28524.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28524.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...The MP monitors SCOM R2 itself but does a way much better job than ever before. Simply because it does not only Alert better when things tend to go wrong but also since new Reports have been added which are a great help...The reports work fast, are easily used and show..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28524.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:03:17 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Solution to Error Configuring MOM Database Failed When Installing SCOM R2 Reporting Component</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28499.item</link>
						<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28499.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28499.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...Got this error message today at a customers site...The related accounts were OK, had enough permissions: within SCOM, SQL and on the related servers. To make it more interesting, it is a split installation: the Data Warehouse database resides on another server than the SQL Reporting Server Services (SSRS) instance. Which can be a challenge...I ran the installation again and now I provided..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28499.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:25:31 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Benefits of Running Operational Data Reports (ODR)</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28486.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28486.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28486.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...These reports gather a summary about  the SCOM (R2) usage related to the Management Group. These reports are used by Microsoft to improve the quality of the Management Packs and SCOM in general...take a look at the ODR Reports themselves. Run them one by one in order to see what goes out. These reports are based on SCOM R2 and the latest SCOM R2 Core MPs. The names of the reports themselves are self explanatory:.." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28486.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:20:34 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Monitor Tips: The difference Between Reset Health and Recalculate Health</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28421.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28421.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28421.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...the Health Explorer is needed in order to set the related Monitor back to its Healthy State in order to get a new Alert when a Critical or Warning situation (State Change) occurs. And now one finds two options to be available: Reset Health and Recalculate Health. Even though both options can have the same end result... there are certain things to reckon with:" &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28421.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:48:26 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>WMI Code Sample to PSCX Set-VolumeLabel </title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28393.item</link>
						<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:16:52 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Richard Siddaway</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28393.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4428' ent:classification='BLOG'>Richard Siddaway</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28393.item'&gt;Richard Siddaway&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"Need to change a volume label.  It couldn’t be easier...Will change the label of the g: drive. PSCX doesn’t supply a cmdlet to read volume labels. But we can get round that with a bit of WMI..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28393.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:16:52 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Query That Upgrades Configuration Manager Clients </title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28312.item</link>
						<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:17:22 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Vitalie Ciobanu</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28312.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4502' ent:classification='BLOG'>Vitalie Ciobanu</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28312.item'&gt;Vitalie Ciobanu&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...Created a package and program with ConfigMgr client upgrade with custom command line parameters. Program command line is...Now, as system resources with older client version are members of this collection they will receive the advertisement and will silently install the latest ConfigMgr client. When the collection will have no system resources..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28312.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:17:22 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Collaboration is Driven by Corporate Culture not Technology</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28309.item</link>
						<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Joris Poelmans</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28309.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='2589' ent:classification='BLOG'>Joris Poelmans</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28309.item'&gt;Joris Poelmans&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...With a new web savvy generation entering the work force companies will need to provide the necessary tools and freedom to allow people to work in ways that you probably did not imagine. This will mainly require a shift in management style from command and control to collaborate and connect..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28309.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:02:15 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Installing CU#3 SQL 2008 SP1 Runs Like a Charm</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28284.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28284.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28284.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...In a SCOM R2 test environment of mine I installed CU #3 for SQL 2008 SP1 since I encountered some SSRS issues. With CU #3 these were solved. So when you run SQL 2008 SP1 for SCOM R2 you can install CU #3...SCOM R2 runs like a charm. CU #3 is to be found here..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28284.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:56:31 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Hotfixes for SCROM (R2) Targeted at Windows Server 2003</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28275.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:45:36 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28275.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28275.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...hotfixes needed/advised when SCOM (R2) is going to monitor a server which is Windows Server 2003 based...These hotfixes are not SCOM based but are targeted at some Windows Server OS components...These are components the SCOM (R2) Agent uses a lot. So it is better to have these components at a good level..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28275.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:45:36 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Check this When Running Cumulative Update 1 for SCOM R2</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28245.item</link>
						<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:22:16 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28245.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28245.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"....I wanted to run CU#1 for SCOM R2. Got an account with admin privileges on the RMS and within SCOM. I downloaded the CU...But then I got an error message during the installation of CU#...it had no access to the SQL instance..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28245.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:22:16 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Setting up a Functional Service Level Tracking (SLT) in OpsMgr R2</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28228.item</link>
						<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:24 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28228.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28228.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...setting up SLT and more specific how to get the Service Level Objectives (SLOs) with the Collection Rules (Collection rule SLO) functional...It is all about targeting. When that isn’t done properly, one ends up with an empty screen...Lets start the SCOM Console, log on as a SCOM Administrator and select..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28228.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:53:24 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>In OpsMgr R2 How to Get Collection Rule SLO Functional</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28215.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:47:03 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28215.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28215.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...setting up SLT and more specific how to get the Service Level Objectives (SLOs) with the Collection Rules (Collection rule SLO) functional...Click on the Change Scope link displayed on the top right in the midsection of the SCOM Console. The Scope Management Pack Object screen is shown..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28215.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:47:03 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Why Your SOA Governance Efforts are so Complicated Today</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28209.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Todd Biske</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28209.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4430' ent:classification='BLOG'>Todd Biske</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28209.item'&gt;Todd Biske&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...How many companies actually practice systemic portfolio management versus “fire-drill” portfolio management, where a “portfolio” is produced on a once-a-year (or some other interval) basis in response to some event, and then ignored for the rest of the time, only to be rebuilt when the next drill occurs. Until these processes are more systemic, governance tools are going to continue to be add-ons to..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28209.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:28:41 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Workaround Steps for ESB Toolkit 2.0 Limited Deployment</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28084.item</link>
						<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Ben Cline</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28084.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4309' ent:classification='BLOG'>Ben Cline</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28084.item'&gt;Ben Cline&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...I found that it is possible to do an limited deployment of assemblies for the pipelines as long as all of the dependent assemblies can be found. I recognize this is not an ideal or officially supported configuration but I found it to be a much quicker deployment...Here are the basic steps..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28084.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:51:38 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Update - Extension to Open Value Subscription Up to Date Discount</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28064.item</link>
						<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:38:40 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Emma Healey</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28064.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4204' ent:classification='BLOG'>Emma Healey</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28064.item'&gt;Emma Healey&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...Customers who sign a new Open Value Subscription or Open Value Subscription for Government agreement and have an existing license for one of the following products:...Every 2007 Microsoft Office system license covered by Software Assurance includes rights to the same edition of Microsoft Office 2010 upon its release." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28064.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:38:40 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>New SCOM MP Catalog is Relocated on MS </title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28059.item</link>
						<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Marnix Wolf</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28059.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4807' ent:classification='BLOG'>Marnix Wolf</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28059.item'&gt;Marnix Wolf&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...the SCOM MP Catalog has moved to a new website and interface. There is much to do about it. However, Microsoft is really interested what the users think about it...two other channels...let them know what you think..." &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28059.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:27:30 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
					<item>
						
						<title>Shutdown TechNet Forums?</title>
						<link>http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28045.item</link>
						<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:22:42 GMT</pubDate>
						<author>Keith Combs</author>
						<category>Management</category>
						<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28045.item</guid>
						<ent:cloud ent:href="http://teched.indepthtalk.net">
						
								<ent:topic ent:id='2255' ent:classification='BLOG'>Keith Combs</ent:topic>
							
								<ent:topic ent:id='4557' ent:classification='SECT'>Management</ent:topic>
							
						</ent:cloud>

<description>	
&lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28045.item'&gt;Keith Combs&lt;/a&gt; writes,
"...if we shut down forums totally, where would people get authoritative answers?  I am not suggesting I plan to make such a drastic change, but think about it.  What if I pulled the plug tomorrow? We wouldn’t have to worry about moderators watching everything that goes on.  We could dump reporting.  We could use the budget for the staffing...What would you do?" &lt;a href='http://teched.indepthtalk.net/TechEd/Tracks/Management/28045.item'&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div style="color:black;font-size:10px;font-style:italic;margin-top:2px;margin-bottom:-2px" &gt;Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:22:42 GMT&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;

&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
	


					</item>
				
	</channel>
</rss>